|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Article |
| |
Congressional Apportionment |
 |
The
average size of a congressional district will rise.
Twelve
seats will shift from one state to another.
Shifts in congressional representation reflect regional trends in population
For more information
|
| |
 |
| |
The Constitutional basis for conducting the decennial census of population is to reapportion the U.S. House of Representatives. Apportionment is the process of dividing the 435 memberships, or seats, in the U.S. House of Representatives among the 50 states. With the exception of the 1920 Census, an apportionment has been made by the Congress on the basis of each decennial census from 1790 to 2010.
The apportionment population for 2010 consists of the resident population of the 50 states plus overseas federal employees (military and civilian) and their dependents living with them, who were included in their home states. The population of the District of Columbia is excluded from the apportionment population because it does not have any voting seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. The 2010 Census apportionment population was 309,183,463.
|
| |
back
to top |
| |
The average size of a congressional district will
rise. |
| |
The number of representatives or seats in the U.S. House of
Representatives has remained constant at 435 since 1911, except for a
temporary increase to 437 at the time of admission of Alaska and Hawaii
as states in 1959. However, the apportionment based on the 1960 Census, which
took effect for the election in 1962, reverted to 435 seats.
The average size of a congressional district based on the 2010 Census
apportionment population will be 710,767, more than triple the average
district size 100 years ago, and 63,815 more than the average size based
on the 2000 Census. Based on the 2010 Census apportionment, the state
with the largest average district size will be Montana and the state
with the smallest average district size will be Rhode Island.
| State |
2010 Apportionment Population |
Number of Representatives |
| 2010 |
2000 |
1910 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Total |
309,183,463 |
435 |
435 |
435 |
| Alabama |
4,802,982 |
7 |
7 |
10 |
| Alaska |
721,523 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
| Arizona |
6,412,700 |
9 |
8 |
1 |
| Arkansas |
2,926,229 |
4 |
4 |
7 |
| California |
37,341,989 |
53 |
53 |
11 |
| Colorado |
5,044,930 |
7 |
7 |
4 |
| Connecticut |
3,581,628 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
| Delaware |
900,877 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Florida |
18,900,773 |
27 |
25 |
4 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Georgia |
9,727,566 |
14 |
13 |
12 |
| Hawaii |
1,366,862 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
| Idaho |
1,573,499 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
| Illinois |
12,864,380 |
18 |
19 |
27 |
| Indiana |
6,501,582 |
9 |
9 |
13 |
| Iowa |
3,053,787 |
4 |
5 |
11 |
| Kansas |
2,863,813 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
| Kentucky |
4,350,606 |
6 |
6 |
11 |
| Louisiana |
4,553,962 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
| Maine |
1,333,074 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Maryland |
5,789,929 |
8 |
8 |
6 |
| Massachusetts |
6,559,644 |
9 |
10 |
16 |
| Michigan |
9,911,626 |
14 |
15 |
13 |
| Minnesota |
5,314,879 |
8 |
8 |
10 |
| Mississippi |
2,978,240 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
| Missouri |
6,011,478 |
8 |
9 |
16 |
| Montana |
994,416 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
| Nebraska |
1,831,825 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
| Nevada |
2,709,432 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
| New Hampshire |
1,321,445 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
| New Jersey |
8,807,501 |
12 |
13 |
12 |
| New Mexico |
2,067,273 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
| New York |
19,421,055 |
13 |
13 |
10 |
| North Carolina |
9,565,781 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
| North Dakota |
675,905 |
15 |
18 |
22 |
| Ohio |
11,568,495 |
16
| 18 |
22 |
| Oklahoma |
3,764,882 |
5 |
5 |
8 |
| Oregon |
3,848,606 |
5 |
5 |
8 |
| Pennsylvania |
12,734,905 |
18 |
19 |
36 |
| Rhode Island |
1,055,247 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| South Carolina |
4,645,975 |
7 |
6 |
7 |
| South Dakota |
819,761 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
| Tennessee |
6,375,431 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
| Texas |
25,268,418 |
36 |
32 |
18 |
| Utah |
2,770,765 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
| Vermont |
630,337 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
| Virginia |
8,037,736 |
11 |
11 |
10 |
| Washington |
6,753,369 |
10 |
9 |
5 |
| West Virginia |
1,859,815 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
| Wisconsin |
5,698,230 |
8 |
8 |
11 |
| Wyoming |
568,300 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Table 1: Apportionment Based on the 2010 Census and Apportionment of the U.S. House of Representatives 2010, 2000, and 1910
|
| |
back
to top |
| |
Twelve seats in the U.S. House of Representatives
will shift from one state to another. |
| |
As a result of the apportionment based on the 2010 Census,
12 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives will shift among 18
states. Eight states will have more representatives in the 113th
Congress, which convened in January 2013, and ten states will have
fewer representative.
Among the eight states gaining seats, Texas will gain four
seats and Florida will gain two seats. The other six states
(Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, South Carolina, Utah, and Washington)
will each gain one seat. Of the ten states losing seats, two
states, New York and Ohio, will each lose two seats. The other
eight states (Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania) will
each lose one seat.
Change in the Number of
U.S. Representatives by State - 2010 |
| State |
Gain |
State |
Loss |
| Total |
12 |
Total |
12 |
| Texas |
4 |
New York |
2 |
| Florida |
2 |
Ohio |
2 |
| Arizona |
1 |
Illinois |
1 |
| Georgia |
1 |
Iowa |
1 |
| Nevadaa |
1 |
Louisiana |
1 |
| South Carolina |
1 |
Massachusetts |
1 |
| Utah |
1 |
Michigan |
1 |
| Washington |
1 |
Missouri |
1 |
| |
|
New Jersey |
1 |
| |
|
Pennsylvania |
1 |
Table 2: Change in the Number of U.S. Representatives by state 2010
|
| |
back
to top |
| |
Shifts in congressional representation reflect regional
trends in population. |
| |
The regional patterns of change in congressional
representation between 2000 and 2010 reflect the nation's
continuing shift in population from the Northeast and Midwest
to the South and West.
Based on the 2010 Census apportionment, the net
increase of seven seats in the South reflected a gain
of eight seats across four states and a loss of one seat.
The West gained four seats and lost none. The Northeast lost
five seats and gained none. The Midwest lost six seats
and gained none.
|
| |

Figure 1: Regional shifts in congressional representation based on the 2010 census
|
| |
back
to top |
| |
For more information |
| |
For more information on apportionment for both
the 2010 and 2000 censuses, visit the U.S. Census
Bureau's Internet site. Other data from the 2010 Census are also available.
Adapted from Kristin D. Burnett, U.S. Census Bureau, Congressional Apportionment in 2010 Census Briefs.
|
| |
back
to top |
|